🔗 Share this article

The true crime genre has an innovative format, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and grammar: police body cam footage. Faces of victims, witnesses and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the harsh glare of headlights or flashlights as the police arrive, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or indignation or dubiously feigned naivety. And we frequently catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other conducts the inquiry with what sometimes seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Documentary Filmmaking

We have previously seen the streaming service true-crime documentary The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an social media personality by her partner, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed surprisingly lenient with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the tragic incident of a Florida mother in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose four young kids allegedly harassed and tormented her white neighbour, a local resident. In 2023, after an increasing number of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were summoned multiple times, Lorincz shot Owens dead through her closed front door, when the victim went to Lorincz’s house to confront her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The investigating authorities found proof that the suspect had done internet searches into Florida’s “stand your ground” laws, which permit residents and others to shoot if there is a reasonable belief of danger. The movie constructs its narrative with the body cam footage captured during the repeated police visits to the location before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also jail video of the individual which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the kids are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The production is showcased as an example of how self-defense regulations generate senseless and tragic violence. But the fact of firearm possession and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator famously claimed made gun deaths a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Police Interrogation and Firearm Norms

It is feasible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel surprised at how little interest the police took in this point. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about microwaves or toasters?

Detention and Consequences

For what appeared to her local residents a extended period, Lorincz was not even taken into custody and indicted, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally formally arrested in the holding cell, there is an remarkable scene in which Lorincz simply refuses to stand, will not extend her arms for the handcuffs, not aggressively, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she just can’t do it. Did the gentle handling up until that point encouraged her to think that this could be effective?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It didn’t; and the panel's decision is revealed in the closing credits. A very sombre portrayal of American crime and punishment.